Return of ‘Garm Hava’ - Nandini Ramnath
आज मिंट में यह लेख छपा है।
MS Sathyu’s ‘Garm Hava’, a New Wave icon,
is being restored and is set to release in theatres. With it, a
near-forgotten phase of cinema will be resurrected
‘Garm Hava’, which captures the decline of the Mirza family
It was 1972, and the Indian New
Wave was coming along nicely. The government-funded Film Finance
Corporation (FFC) was handing out loans to directors who wanted to break
away from the escapist and formulaic movies being churned out by the
Hindi movie dream factory. Some film-makers were more interested in
nightmares, among them M.S. Sathyu, who had earned a name for himself
lighting and designing sets and directing plays for the stage. A script
submitted by him to the FFC was rejected, so he handed in another one—a
story about a Muslim family that chooses to stay back in India after
Partition in 1947 but gets uprooted from within in the process.
The rebirth of Garm Hava is
the result of passion, doggedness, and deep pockets. The process was
started by Subhash Chheda, a Mumbai-based distributor who runs the DVD
label Rudraa. Chheda approached Sathyu a few years ago, asking for
permission to produce DVDs from the film’s negative. The negative had
aged badly and was damaged in many places. The idea then took root of
expanding the scope of the project—to re-release the film in theatres
and re-introduce audiences to its sobering pleasures.
“The film was visually corrected
in consultation with Sathyu,” Chheda says. “We have also upgraded the
sound. Dolby digital, 5.1, whichever format is there, the film is now
available. People should not feel that they are watching a dated film.”
“We are keen on bringing other
timeless Indian classics to the surface,” Deshpanday says. “The film
touches upon a very live subject. If you show Garm Hava today, anybody will think it’s a contemporary film. It has that kind of depth and timelessness.”
The attention lavished on Garm Hava is
a bit ironic, considering that the film nearly didn’t make it to movie
halls. The Mumbai office of the Central Board of Film Certification
rejected the film, citing its potential to stir up communal trouble.
Sathyu used his contacts to approach the then prime minister, Indira
Gandhi. She ordered the film to be released without any cuts. But even
the all-powerful Gandhi—she was only a year away from imposing Emergency
on the nation and revoking the democratic rights of citizens—couldn’t
ensure a smooth theatrical release. “N.N. Sippy took up the film’s
distribution, but he backed out when we showed the film at a festival
ahead of its release,” Sathyu says. “I eventually approached a friend in
Karnataka who owned a distribution company and a chain of cinemas, and
he released the film first in Bangalore.” Only then did other
distributors step in to ensure that movie goers saw for themselves the
tragedy of a Muslim family that opts for India over Pakistan.
Shama Zaidi, Sathyu’s wife and the
screenplay writer of several Shyam Benegal films, based the script on a
conversation she had with Ismat Chughtai, the Urdu novelist who has
written extensively on Partition. Chughtai shared with Sathyu and Zaidi
accounts of her family members, including an uncle who worked at a
railway station and watched Muslim families gradually leave India in
hopeful search of a better welcome across the border. The couple showed
the script to poet and writer Kaifi Azmi, who wrote the dialogue and
added to the screenplay his experiences of working with
shoe-manufacturing workers in Kanpur.
The movie was made on a minuscule
budget even by 1970s standards—a loan of Rs 2.5 lakh from the FFC and Rs
7.5 lakh borrowed by Sathyu from here and there. Like so many movies
produced on the margins of the Hindi film industry, Garm Hava was
made possible by the kindness of friends. The film was shot by
cinematographer Ishan Arya—also making his debut after working in plays
and advertisements—with a second-hand Arriflex camera loaned to the crew
by Sathyu’s friend, Homi Sethna. Sathyu’s involvement with the Leftist
Indian People’s Theatre Association (Ipta) resulted in parts for many
actors from Ipta troupes in Delhi, Mumbai and Agra. The only real star
on the set was the venerated Balraj Sahni in the role of Salim Mirza.
Sahni, whose immensely dignified performance is one of the movie’s many
highlights, was paid Rs 5,000 for his efforts. Shama Zaidi doubled up as
the costume and production designer. Ishan Arya co-produced the film
apart from creating its memorable images, which include a lovely moment
of Amina and her new lover, Shamshad, consummating their relationship on
a riverbank opposite the Taj Mahal. “We were all in tune with the kind
of film we were making,” Sathyu says. “Ideologically, we were all alike
and that is important.”
Despite having a pool of Ipta
actors to dip into, Sathyu struggled to find the right woman to play the
small but pivotal part of Salim Mirza’s aged mother. He wanted to cast
the Hindustani classical singer Begum Akhtar, but she turned down the
role. Help came from unexpected quarters. The Mirza mansion, a symbol
both of the family’s social standing and their fall from grace, was
hired from a Mathur family. “The man who owned the house told me that
previous generations of his family had patronized dancing girls,” Sathyu
says. “I felt that these dancers must still be around in Agra, so I
asked Mr Mathur to take me to a brothel.”
Garm Hava was a personal
milestone but also something of a millstone for Sathyu, who is now 82
and lives in Bangalore. “When you hit a peak with your first film,
everything else you do is compared to it,” he says. He has made nine
feature films in different languages, including Hindi and Kannada, and
is trying to cobble together the finances to make a multilingual
musical. He continues to work in theatre, and will stage a production of
the Ipta classic Moteram Ka Satyagraha in Mumbai on 7 September. “Garm Hava is
a sentimental story—it brings tears to people’s eyes, which is what
people like,” he says self-deprecatingly about his debut.
Apart from showcasing a gem from
the treasure trove of Indian cinema, the restoration refocuses attention
on Indian New Wave cinema, which produced serious-minded,
issue-oriented films against severe odds. The collective approach that
made Garm Hava possible, the monetary sacrifices by its cast and
crew, and the passion for creating cinema that leads to social change
have all but vanished. The creative ferment of the time is nicely
captured by Ipta member and actor Masood Akhtar in his feature-length
documentary Kahan Kahan Se Guzre, which will be shown in Mumbai
in August. Akhtar’s film contains valuable information about Sathyu and
the theatre scene of the 1970s and 1980s as well as personal insights
into the director (his real name is Sathyanarayan, he is a charming
flirt, his daughters call him “Sathyu” rather than “Daddy”.) “I consider
myself his assistant, and the film is my tribute to him,” Akhtar says.
The documentary ends with the dramatic but appropriate Latin words “O tempora! O mores!” Thanks to the restoration of Garm Hava, the times and the customs of a near-forgotten phase of cinema will return, if only briefly.
**************
Separate lives
From Ritwik Ghatak to Yash Chopra, our leading film-makers have variously interpreted Partition
The division of Punjab has featured directly and obliquely in the works of Yash Chopra. Dharmputra
(1961) spans the period before and after independence. Shashi Kapoor
plays a Hindu fundamentalist who discovers that he is actually a Muslim
who was adopted by Hindu parents at birth. In Chopra’s Veer-Zaara (2004),
Zaara comes to India to immerse the ashes of her Sikh nanny. She falls
in love with a Hindu pilot, who later crosses the border to find her. It
is said that every Hindi movie about children or siblings separated
from their family members is actually about Partition. Could the
earthquake that splits the family of Kedarnath in Yash Chopra’s Waqt (1965) actually be an indirect reference to Partition?
There is no such coyness in Gadar: Ek Prem Katha (2001),
Anil Sharma’s chest-thumping and eardrum-shattering movie about the
romance between a Sikh man and a Muslim woman during the tumult of 1947 .
A saner, and altogether quieter movie told from the Pakistani
perspective is Sabiha Sumar’s Khamosh Pani (2003). Set in the
1970s, the movie recounts the dilemma of a Sikh woman who marries the
Muslim man who abducts her, but is forced to confront her past when her
son becomes a religious fundamentalist. Pinjar (2003),
Chandraprakash Dwivedi’s glossy adaptation of Amrita Pritam’s novel, is
also about the experiences of a Punjabi Hindu woman whose family rejects
her after she is abducted by a Muslim man.
Literature has given film-makers ample material to work with. Pamela Rooks’ Train to Pakistan (1998) is based on the Khushwant Singh novel, while Deepa Mehta’s Earth (1998) is taken from Bapsi Sidhwa’s Ice Candy Man. Bhisham Sahni’s Tamas,
a novel about pre-Partition madness in Amritsar, led to Govind
Nihalani’s television series of the same name—one of the best ever works
on the period.
Photographs courtesy MS Sathyu
Comments