mahesh bhatt in hindu
-Anuj Kumar
From master of soul curry to purveyor of carnal potpourri, Mahesh Bhatt has come a long way
From master of soul curry to purveyor of carnal potpourri, Mahesh Bhatt has come a long way
Once upon a time Mahesh Bhatt defined subversion in
Hindi film industry but in the last few years the enfant terrible of
Bollywood seems to have conformed to the needs of the market. Once he
caressed the wounds of soul, found new meaning in man-woman
relationships, today he panders to the baser instincts. He might have
said good bye to direction but he remains the voice of Vishesh Films.
Recently he wrote Jism 2 for his daughter Pooja Bhatt and in a few weeks from now he will be presenting another sequel of Raaz.
He still makes a lot of sense on social platforms and his steamy flicks
make a lot of money at the box office but it is hard to find a connect
between the two Bhatts. One appeals to mind while the other seems to be
after the easily-stirred parts of the body.
“In 2000,
after I gave up direction and Indian economy had opened, all kind of
international content had begun to pour into our homes so much so that
even the tribals of Bastar could watch Star World. The emotional images
and sound consumption which were very middle class and austere were
replaced by very luscious and erotic images. I felt that the world has
changed but the Hindi film industry has not. That’s when we introduced
films like Raaz, Jism and Murder. The business proposition was clear in our minds. Hollywood had already gone through the erotic thriller phase,” he confesses.
He
reminds that the banner had not given up on diversity all of a sudden.
“Pooja has only one hit in the last decade and that is Jism. She made Holiday, a story of middle class and not so good looking girl. She made Dhoka,
which pointed out how state could behave like a terrorist. It was
perhaps the first film where a Muslim protagonist had said, ‘you have
cheated the Muslims of India.’ Why does a section of society come and
ask questions when all that the majority wants is instant gratification.
”
Bhatt holds that you can’t entrust the task of
leading a lost generation on filmmakers. He underlines that he refused
be straitjacketed even in the 80s. “I made Saraansh and then immediately followed it with Naam.
People commented, oh! you are selling out your soul. The problem of
cultural czars is that they want I should be only their dog, singing
their song according to their likes and dislikes. The moment I start to
sing to a population which has alternative tastes they think it is
deterioration. In the Centenary year of Hindi cinema why the stunt films
that my father (Nanabhai Bhatt) made should not be celebrated. Why Homi
Wadia’s work should be ignored? They entertained the people of India,
the rickshaw puller, the poor farmer. Is it just because the museum keys
are in the hands of people, who have a particular colonised taste?”
Bhatt asks.
He alleges that these are the kind of
bureaucrats and politicians who had disdain for Mehboob Khan. “Because
they considered him illiterate, because he didn’t speak their language.”
It is this bureaucrat-led aristocracy that he holds responsible for the
collapse of NFDC movement. “They made cinema which the audience could
not connect with, but they gave it awards. That cinema didn’t work even
for television. I have no problem with pluralism but I detest tyranny of
taste. I come from a middle class background. I don’t have cultivated
tastes like the great filmmakers of Europe.”
He insists nobody enters the entertainment industry for selfless service. “But if you notice the content of Jism and Raaz,
it has a world view. It may be wrapped in an erotic thriller or horror
but has a perception which is not borrowed from international film
festivals. It is mine; it has Mahesh Bhatt’s finger prints.”
Still,
at a time when the youth is going through socio-political upheaval why
numb their minds with images of an adult film star. “The image of a
‘Chameli’ standing on a street corner is passé. It is a reference which
has worn out. Today we have porn stars. The story was about a woman
yearning for enduring love. Middle class woman might disown her but she
has similar cultural aspirations, kind of hard wired in her. As for the
Anna movement you are referring to, it was yet another fairytale of
national awakening which has died.”
In the last few months there have been films which said something substantial. But Bhatt begs to differ. “In 1974 my first film Manzilein Aur Bhi Hain
was banned for subverting the institution of marriage. At 22, I
realised in India good people fall in love, bad people have sex. My
heroine was in a relationship with two men. It is still not part of
mainstream discourse.”
The problem, he says, lies in
the hierarchy of thought that we have created. “You find the person
going to the bar inferior to the person going to the temple. I see them
as the same. Both are running away from the inner anguish. Both are
seeking to escape from something. Both will flourish. The pursuit for
enduring pleasure could either be through intellectual understanding or
flesh.” Then why do most of his films conform to societal norms after
intermission? “The values are so deeply structured in us that we get
trapped. So every narrative moves from darkness to light.”
If
he has accepted the route why doesn’t he return to the director’s
chair? The ground seems to be swelling with defiant ideas. “I am done
with it. The parameters of cinema are not wide enough to express my
subversive nature. In my book I could stare down at things without
worrying about box office repercussions. Films demand huge investments
and a feel-good end and I cannot give painful truths to make money.”
At
a time when his second daughter is entering the film industry, he is
giving an impression that this generation doesn’t deserve him.
“I have told Alia to discover her own path. You have only two choices.
Either go with the truth or stay safe with lies. All of you have chosen
to stay safe with lies.”
Meanwhile, he promises to continue to write for films for a generation, which he says, still believes in fairytales.
“They
want to see enduring love that justice lasts…and I am here to reinvent
those fairytales put in the garb of modern cinematic idiom, till the
time they like to hear the lies in an engaging way. But is this
something germane to my understanding of life, I would say no. Kabir
made pots. I do foolish things but that doesn’t mean I am foolish,”
concludes Bhatt.
Comments